Kevin Thomas Ryan

Kevin Thomas Ryan

The Horizon

The Horizon: Disruption and Uncertainty

Signals | Week ending 21 March 2026 – Escalation in the Middle East; central banks holding the line; markets signalling elevated volatility; and this week’s strategic and systemic insights

Kevin Thomas Ryan's avatar
Kevin Thomas Ryan
Mar 21, 2026
∙ Paid
The Horizon: Disruption and Uncertainty - Signals for week ending 21 March 2026

Top Signal: Middle East Escalation Further Disrupts Energy Markets

This week, in a signal that geopolitical conflict is overtaking economic conditions as the primary driver, the ongoing situation in the Middle East (now entering week three) escalated sharply, with new attacks on energy infrastructure across Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait, prolonging the de facto disruption of the Strait of Hormuz.

In a major escalation, in what officials and media reports attribute to an Israeli strike on the Iranian sector of the South Pars gas field in the Persian Gulf, the world’s largest natural gas deposit, was followed by Iranian ​missile attacks on its Gulf neighbours, including the Qatari industrial hub, Ras Laffan, ​causing what has been described as “extensive damage” to its ⁠core LNG plants (which are amongst the world’s largest).

Afterwards, the US President Donald Trump threatened to “blow up” the South Pars gas field if the Iranians continued their attacks on Qatar. In a post on his Truth Social platform, the US president also posted:

“I do not want to authorize this level of violence and destruction because of the long-term implications that it will have on the future of Iran, but if Qatar’s LNG is again attacked, I will not hesitate to do so”

Saudi Arabia is reported to have also signalled a willingness to respond militarily against Iran if necessary.

The immediate effect of this week’s escalation was visible: oil surged to about $119 (Brent) per barrel at one point, and global oil and LNG flows from the Strait of Hormuz region, which normally carries about 20% of global oil trade, have seen significant disruptions as shipping routes became unsafe and insurance premiums soared.

The impact of these developments in the Middle East was visible in Europe, where gas prices subsequently soared to three-year highs. Prices at the service station continued to increase, particularly in member states such as Germany, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Finland.

In a signal that the US administration is becoming more concerned about the impact of rising prices, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent signalled that the U.S. is considering waivers that would allow sales of sanctioned Iranian oil already at sea, echoing last week’s decision to grant temporary exemptions for certain Russian cargos. However, he ruled out intervening in the oil futures markets.

In addition to energy infrastructure, tanker traffic in the Middle East has been directly targeted, with vessels described as “sitting ducks” amid widening attacks, and naval protection, for now, proving slow and uncertain in the strait’s narrow shipping lanes.

This conflict has grown legs and is now exerting systemic pressure on global trade infrastructure and energy flows, with key chokepoints and hubs under sustained threat. Even alternative routes such as Saudi exports via the Red Sea are now under pressure, with drone attacks reported in the region.

For Europe, Asia, and the wider global economy, this is translating into immediate second-order effects with rising energy costs, supply chain instability, and inflationary pressure. The magnitude and persistence of that inflationary pressure remain highly uncertain and will depend heavily on the duration of the supply disruption and market expectations. Reuters CNN President Trump on Truth Social WSJ Fox Business Euronews

Key Signals

Central Banks Hold the Line Amid Uncertainty

In both Europe and the United States, the European Central Bank, the Bank of England, and the Federal Reserve maintained their cautious stance this week by leaving interest rates unchanged, signalling a “higher-for-longer” narrative in an economic environment of increasing uncertainty. Given the tone of this week’s policy decisions, expectations of rate reductions (or at least, the amount of them) should be pushed out further.

Monetary policymakers are increasingly acknowledging downside risks to growth, while inflation remains sticky. European economic data continues to soften. The rise in energy prices caused by the ongoing war in the Middle East is a driver in the ECB’s revised downward growth projections and upward revision of its inflation projections (beyond its 2% target) for 2026. Developments in the Middle East were also a cause for concern for the Bank of England, which signalled an expectation that CPI inflation could now be higher as a result of the energy shock.

Meanwhile, U.S. signals are mixed; economic activity has been expanding at a solid pace, but job gains have remained low, and inflation remains somewhat elevated. The implications of the ongoing developments in the Middle East for the U.S. economy are also a stated cause for concern for the Fed in fulfilling its dual mandate. The coming weeks will provide more visibility.

These geopolitical-driven macro disruptions create a policy tension: cut too early and risk inflation credibility; wait too long and risk economic slowdown.

Markets are beginning to sense this tension.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Kevin Thomas Ryan · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture